Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 04:21
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Has anyone tried bestiality and been caught?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Microsoft’s Free New Windows Upgrade: How It Works And How To Get It - Forbes
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sir Keir Starmer announces national inquiry into grooming gangs - BBC
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
The everyday activity that can reveal your brain’s age - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sunt explicabo sunt omnis eveniet enim et.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Saepe ut vero explicabo illo hic aspernatur.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear: